According to the Catholic English versions the name of two persons mentioned
in the New Testament. In Greek, however, the names are different, one being
Cleopas, abbreviated form of Cleopatros, and the other Clopas. The first one,
Cleopas, was one of the two disciples to whom the risen Lord appeared at Emmaus
(Luke, xxiv, 18). We have no reliable data concerning him; his name is entered
in the martyrology on the 25th of September. (See Acta Sanctorum, Sept., VII, 5
sqq.) The second, Clopas, is mentioned in St. John, xix, 25, where a Mary is
called Maria he tou Klopa, which is generally translated by
Mary the wife of
Clopas. This name, Clopas, is thought by many to be the Greek transliteration
of an Aramaic Alphaeus. This view is based on the identification of Mary, the
mother of James etc. (Mark, xv, 40) with Mary, the wife of Clopas, and the
consequent identity of Alphaeus, father of James (Mark, iii, 18), with Clopas.
Etymologically, however, the identification of the two names offers serious
difficulties: (1) Although the letter Heth is occasionally rendered in Greek by
Kappa at the end and in the middle of words, it is very seldom so in the
beginning, where the aspirate is better protected; examples of this, however,
are given by Levy (Sem. Fremdwörter in Griech.); but (2) even if this difficulty
was met, Clopas would suppose an Aramaic Halophai, not Halpai. (3) The Syriac
versions have rendered the Greek Clopas with a Qoph, not with a Heth, as they
would have done naturally had they been conscious of the identity of Clopas and
Halpai; Alphaeus is rendered with Heth (occasionally Aleph). For these reasons,
others see in Clopas a substitute for Cleopas, with the contraction of eo into w.
In Greek, it is true, eo is not contracted into w, but a Semite, borrowing a
name did not necessarily follow the rules of Greek contraction. In fact, in
Mishnic Hebrew the name Cleopatra is rendered by Clopatra, and hence the Greek
Cleopas might be rendered by Clopas. See also, Chabot,
Journ. Asiat., X, 327
(1897). Even if, etymologically, the two names are different they may have been
borne by one name, and the question of the identity of Alphaeus and Clopas is
still open. If the two persons are distinct, then we know nothing of Clopas
beyond the fact recorded in St. John; if, on the contrary, they are identified,
Clopas' personality is or may be closely connected with the history of the
brethren of the Lord and of James the Less.
Schegg, Jakobus der Bruder des Hern (Munich, 1883); Nicoll, Alphaeus and Klopas in The Expositor (1885), 79 sqq; Wetzel, Alphaeus u. Klopas in Theolog. Stud. u. Krit. (1883), 620 sq.; Jaquier in Vig, Dict. de la Bib., s.v. Alphee; also commentaries on John xix, 25.
Suchen bei amazon: Bücher über Catholic Encyclopedia - Cleophas
korrekt zitieren: Artikel
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet das Ökumenische Heiligenlexikon in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://d-nb.info/1175439177 und http://d-nb.info/969828497 abrufbar.